From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIneV-0007n7-0g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 02:12:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIneU-0005GZ-0H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 02:12:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIneT-0005GP-TZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 02:12:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIneT-0004Mm-Py for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 02:12:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#39765] Add package JupyterLab Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:10:54 +0200 From: Lars-Dominik Braun Message-ID: <20200330061054.GA3329@zpidnp36> References: <20200224101810.GA9010@zpidnp36> <87d08y915t.fsf@gnu.org> <20200327073027.GA4578@zpidnp36> <87ftdr1b3c.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87ftdr1b3c.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 39765@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludo, > (It’s not about what I personally want or don’t want, of course. :-)) > In general, the guideline is to have patches that are either included > upstream, just not in a published release, or are Guix-specific and thus > are not meant to be included upstream. > > This patch doesn’t seem to fall in any of these two categories, so I > would prefer not to have it, at least not until upstream has included > it. sure, I can see that :) Lars