From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIkIJ-0004iX-Ly for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:36:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIkII-0004Z6-FI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:36:55 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIkII-0004YY-Av for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:36:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIkII-0004rB-7X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:36:54 -0400 Subject: bug#40105: [PATCH] gnu: Add wol. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 00:09:35 +0100 From: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= Message-ID: <20200328230935.7tqjyjazm55pv3fr@gravity> References: <20200319125527.diyj7squla4jfhv2@gravity> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aa624at3dk6ckevo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Vincent Legoll Cc: 40105-done@debbugs.gnu.org --aa624at3dk6ckevo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:57:42PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote: > > > + (description "Tool to send a @code{magic} packet to wake another= host > > > +on the network. This must be enabled on the target host, usually in= the > > > +BIOS.") > > > > If I may ask, what's the rationale behind putting "magic" in a @code tag > > here? >=20 > I think I copied that desc from somewhere else (maybe nixos) and it had q= uoting > around, and then guix lint told me to use @code instead, I probably shoul= d just > have removed the quotes... Nothing more than that, you can remove them if > you want to commit, or if you want I can resubmit without... Sorry for taking a while to respond on this, but I pushed your patch as commit 62b9ad19e3a6638f8e077753454fdf08ba586146 with two changes: Firstly, I removed the @code tag as you suggested. Secondly, I removed the references to `name' in the URL, since, as the contributing guidelines suggest, the URL likely won't be valid if the name gets changed. Cheers! --aa624at3dk6ckevo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE5Xa/ss9usT31cTO54xWnWEYTFWQFAl5/2S8ACgkQ4xWnWEYT FWS3sxAA3gKo63wWJq5O8Cgm4Pfak3U3VmDzmSPt1bZywnfjcckMmrf79MQQbEap NDqbP2qU0u3VrK4NyghiaDLuJ3oeTO/G8WQZZ2KyyuaxYsG2vPRBPpx4Sn+SDjnp MOuvSJtBFbWE+X6W+Mq1EdqhcsOWQWVoqlYoxyvQplSjNQFogBq1T+9BOrBZa405 nQPlpVNWyyi8UtLMG6cx9cUdkGPMz/qsWVo3Y/wKu4k3YtlLTvdXTHuUyNGibC6k WNxiZjws4FbH336jG1AO3ixBTQ3jhgU1l1npwU40YL/YSgeDcn4Z/0VUjVimQHDS CBR+1z2dpghWqZMo07vlJwcQhDsWakLzxWXptB7D93mL6TO/iY0YsyVmyLjn1R/v vARMOA2VHFumi9RTOzVnJ0WUqVlBR3x7ztcuSbNnV0O8N0ayWDOpTC1WXstXtHzH WiA5x9SLGW9qZV+bsSeIV8zPq5V4y0VzQeMi/qCAu0T30IIqHiwWs3TR7tL7TwHq g80kU1q18x7mfOwMeihK8PD12xll0tj2+NQoNgEg9X+rnlI59cGHm5lNtgHa/btL DvIwnILvJDQKHDxQsy3FQ9V6QADi/m7awSL3uJqXON1dl7fKoYZOhJbJy9bPZUZF 6y1psWd8RYet4idy7BO3RQEWbXq+tibhe2tPiZf53HMUnsl1aGo= =Lt+m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aa624at3dk6ckevo--