From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jDvyx-0008IF-GU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:05:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jDvyw-0005nF-Eu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:05:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jDvyw-0005mW-Bn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:05:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jDvyw-0002SG-6R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:05:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#37868] [PATCH v6] system: Add kernel-module-packages to operating-system. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:04:25 +0100 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20200316210425.5a90e0cc@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <874kuofzlk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200226195929.3615-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20200227122519.3226-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <877dzlibaj.fsf@gnu.org> <20200315224832.5f2e336c@scratchpost.org> <874kuofzlk.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/R+ZNVtE/qo6ZwrYrLd4GfWk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 37868@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/R+ZNVtE/qo6ZwrYrLd4GfWk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, should it be possible to have a kernel without module support in Guix? Is there a system test already that tests that case? I ask because I don't know what depmod would do when passed such a kernel. (I'm trying pretty hard here to not break that case--but actually I don't e= ven know whether it works in the first place) Is it easily possible to build such a kernel? --Sig_/R+ZNVtE/qo6ZwrYrLd4GfWk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl5v28kACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUy9ggAiUEUSS0wD21ybvErqI3X1qb0oZiYaa/KYbTSsIfykA7Vx2OtbblJ3Aut +uJmXvgwI8hNpE27BgLw1Cx7uov4yoofdvP1G9LaX6sVkvl3oow8RupM/Q94pLr3 lJg8rwBWMX8h4yunux5Rm27uVu88RwgAM0lVoMMf0FBLdluR09Fc0x9o6DJN9RbI hRk3ILCWoa14tnf4fXGUQzAEnLYJYToaJ2PSEXTX1HOpFJ0mC68OfGnFQd2xfNVF g5Uy9Yywv6R9NBqj+iEzz7nV/+RFOfBUlbCShm6Dgpcc4oTxsVKZ2xvRNx19x0uX V8iF7LeJKv4F+PIIbiZHn5LJxg7a5A== =Qbgy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/R+ZNVtE/qo6ZwrYrLd4GfWk--