From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jC6pn-0005jH-9n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:16:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jC6pm-0006PH-AH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:16:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jC6pm-0006PA-6N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:16:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jC6pm-0007dd-27 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:16:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#39777] [PATCH V3 02/11] gnu: python-cachy: Update to 0.3.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:14:55 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200311191455.GA13879@jasmine.lan> References: <20200309081827.13489-1-tanguy@bioneland.org> <20200309081827.13489-2-tanguy@bioneland.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200309081827.13489-2-tanguy@bioneland.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tanguy Le Carrour Cc: 39777@debbugs.gnu.org On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:18:18AM +0100, Tanguy Le Carrour wrote: > * gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-cachy): Update to 0.3.0. > [arguments]: Disable failing tests. > + (arguments > + '(#:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-before 'check 'disable-failing-tests > + (lambda _ > + (substitute* "tests/stores/test_memcached_store.py" > + (("def test_forever") "def _test_forever") > + (("def test_increment") "def _test_increment") > + (("def test_decrement") "def _test_decrement") > + (("def test_put_numeric_value") "def _test_put_numeric_value") > + (("def test_put_value_into_memcache") "def _test_put_value_into_memcache") > + (("def test_value_is_returned") "def _test_value_is_returned") > + (("def test_value_is_returned_for_numerics") "def _test_value_is_returned_for_numerics")) > + #t))))) Do you have any idea what's going on with these tests? We should at least add a comment here, explaining why skipping the tests is not hiding something that will be a problem while using cachy.