From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#25201: Re bug#25201: [PATCH] gnu: Patch mumble to disable statistic gathering by default. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:22:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20200310182250.GA26542@E5400> References: <20200309104242.GH1423@E5400> <20200309235402.24941-1-mike@rohleder.de> <20200310085601.GR1423@E5400> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBjXw-0003FS-16 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:24:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBjXu-0005D0-RA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:24:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBjXu-0005Cu-NP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBjXu-0000We-K0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:24:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Jack Hill Cc: 25201-done@debbugs.gnu.org --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:50:57AM -0400, Jack Hill wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Thanks for improving Guix! Having an old bug closed is great. >=20 > I'm trying to follow along, and learn some things about making Guix > packages. One question I have after seeing this change is how did you dec= ide > whether to make this change in the source definition (with a patch or a > snippet) or in a phase during the build? >=20 > Perhaps for this change the differences don't matter to much, so I won't > learn much, but I thought I'd ask anyway :) >=20 > Best, > Jack In general changes in snippets are used to remove non-free software and to allow the software to build. The idea is that 'guix build -S foo' will return the source for foo which could be taken to a non-guix system and built normally. In practice I'm not sure how often this is the case. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl5n2vcACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1Gdqg//Rv+aAwgTIkN80uueLDjYDxKxOv5o9SAzkSRjPOdAkMo0S9emhqaUVDjX ZJN5hRdKTsP1llDqt4FJh68rt+F9YrzwoTSkO9xkEP/25NvwE0hM2dzcCxkts2fz yER32DpX0TXaQyJYKF65peW+Vo4WjsHngIN0JZ1vNEGeCVGHn9KSnf+4fDVnJxdk Po/rDSaaxVmEMFxKh2gIwPSjPbjvuZ5psWHJpocnQHEC8uY36vnlY/oS/+jhFmur ff9MraMtem8jHqT4IhG00S3w3udD/rBulG0/3kpXjFV2oOBmktECmTwVcQteUxvE Q2JiL/UiMCDAl45HQeMeyLK9LYmmd8SOJxeiLk2yK+AbBL52gQFRc5VQBB7mXb7p mC3OJ1fqXuWeYnKCT74VciIm77FmGuXWPnPzD4VUivD54y2tkNx0ILrQGveT0y3n V8AxSzgrCmP4hal7OyvoN1yFU3//3mOvvbBWI71/mB5D4z14Lx4dXX1hqaHFDq23 u+iiD4m3O0xLV05o22GJocysq7dAqaMvJV9N1hnhMP7+HugU3hWggeNjrTz2F6iT tyutbl37ZHmRsat5hVsK1qUuAgqxPXQxu0IqZPeqmVyTSGaflIxpVO0hv81rR8bR ylkgA3HgvmY4wUyYnxKbZ9P2q2QoPJj9k8SEnYiAKyqNmeEsTDo= =J2ls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--