From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lars-Dominik Braun <ldb@leibniz-psychology.org>
Subject: bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:19:01 +0100
Message-ID: <20200310071901.GB2917@zpidnp36>
References: <20200305133318.GB2909@zpidnp36> <87ftem7m6d.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20200306074018.GC2909@zpidnp36> <87wo7xoiuj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20200306114548.GD2909@zpidnp36> <87zhcraxce.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20200309082253.GA2917@zpidnp36> <87fteh3iwv.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57927)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jBZBL-0004Hq-CR
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jBZBK-0005uM-6I
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45777)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jBZBK-0005tr-2j
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jBZBJ-0000Az-Sd
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39925.B39925.1583824750616@debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87fteh3iwv.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 39925@debbugs.gnu.org


--tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey Ludo,

> For #2, we would need to do something like Jakub did in (guix scripts
> system reconfigure), where the effectul bits can be transparently
> evaluated either locally or remotely.
I don=E2=80=99t understand why #2 needs different mechanics. As I said, /va=
r/guix is
mounted r/w on every machine and in fact `guix package -i` is working as
intended.

Maybe we=E2=80=99ve got a communication issue here and we=E2=80=99re talkin=
g about two
different things?

Lars


--tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=thRn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw--