From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBR1I-0002qd-Nh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 18:37:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBR1F-0005bH-93 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 18:37:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBR1C-0005Zf-Ir for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 18:37:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBR1C-0002Kn-Ft for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 18:37:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#39989] [PATCH] gnu: thunar: Wrap with glib:bin to fix launching programs. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 23:36:22 +0100 From: Jan Message-ID: <20200309233622.291d8227@kompiuter> In-Reply-To: <87zhcpciha.fsf@GlaDOS.home> References: <20200308231200.73b90f30@interia.pl> <20200308222319.2401-1-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> <20200309181108.1650204a@scratchpost.org> <20200309210804.47a9aa11@kompiuter> <87zhcpciha.fsf@GlaDOS.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Diego Nicola Barbato Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 39989@debbugs.gnu.org On Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:43:13 +0100 Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: > I would like to point out =E2=80=94 in case you don't already know =E2=80= =94 that the > issue addressed in this patch is not specific to thunar. It also > shows up in MATE (https://debbugs.gnu.org/38135) and is caused by > glib itself looking for gio-launch-desktop in $PATH. More > importantly, it has already been fixed on in commit > 0bcc1b14fc3e2382406b97577c56e2292b96b8d4 on core-updates (which is > why the aforementioned bug has been closed). >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Diego This explains why both Mate and Xfce were broken, I kept this in my mind as one possibility, but the long time it took to fix it made me think it's not. Thanks for the information!=20 At least I didn't completely waste my time, because I learned something about wrappers :) Jan Wielkiewicz