From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars-Dominik Braun Subject: bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 08:40:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20200306074018.GC2909@zpidnp36> References: <20200305133318.GB2909@zpidnp36> <87ftem7m6d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jA7bU-0001lE-H7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:41:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jA7bT-0000wQ-Fw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:41:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jA7bT-0000vb-CP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:41:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jA7bS-0002y3-8S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 02:41:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ftem7m6d.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 39925@debbugs.gnu.org --ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludo, > This is a limitation in =E2=80=98build-aux/build-self.scm=E2=80=99: [=E2= =80=A6] I don=E2=80=99t understand what=E2=80=99s going on there unfortunately. Is = there a high-level explanation somewhere in the manual? > We could work around it by letting the =E2=80=98GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=E2=80= =99 environment > variable through, along these lines: Nope, that does not seem to be enough. After pulling on master doing the sa= me on a node (with a patched guix) yields: ---snip--- ice-9/eval.scm:293:34: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#" errno: 95] 7f0f325f77b0>)= '. ---snap--- Any ideas? > + (when (and (not (file-port? port) daemon-socke= t)) (when (and (not (file-port? port)) daemon-socket) I assume: =E2=86=91 > [=E2=80=A6] and won=E2=80=99t work with old Guix revisions anyway. That means `guix time-machine` could not go back beyond a commit that fixes= the issue, correct? Not a concern for me. > However, for your use case, you could perhaps simply pull on one machine > and use =E2=80=98guix copy=E2=80=99 to send Guix elsewhere? The store is the same on all machines, since /gnu/store, /var/guix and /home are all shared via NFS. As far as I understand the manual `guix copy` would= be useful for store to store transfers on different machines only. Lars --ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEyk+M9DfXR4/aBV/UQhN3ARo3hEYFAl5h/mAACgkQQhN3ARo3 hEaIigwAq3b8Oa2bLKiVr4ytMk4nMGyYYoUUs1onF1uzCIQQyxOdsvqizMCj+ouM R1m4MxWyuFcVM33gbzrLcJN8pCIepMPt0GD9iZnybK8nQ4EBf5wZGTSJ+FfzmLbh B7Cp7X1WkCfo8/SeUj0a3UwfvarzWYGOh2cELvrlnaQrkfDWA9gAElLPEbDQUu9T BbfmNoAWyZD4nMHRhBW41q8CSDfGjIh7mrWeUyFiVMcKNQGF8AyttibSHSjM5hpa snetCoMtIrWQWl6R9NSnjb3kg2kZxfvSN1fChmqkV7QblIeMEG0kxe3MSEoAswWn ExG9rRRBCzEM+nlgV4lYZW7OcYB0F0p7EApldnmg4iO2zbcqacu4/sQb2NKnW4nA Drem07JMexHnwHJBncVVUQj5A03sIgAtEXf34FapTFeUh7XVbuwPwDRCF1w5CM51 z9Ti3eE8FHaMFtGx2FKrZUiayzXaAddomxRV4I2jAT1VYKJuZgwhp5iCFSb5YCTM v7v8Pxau =Ta+7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz--