From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: rav1e AV1 encoder Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:30:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20200228133043.GN12956@E5400> References: <20200225200823.GA31497@jasmine.lan> <20200226041429.GA1225@jasmine.lan> <20200226070905.GD12956@E5400> <20200227172613.GB30619@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDy5+/kaQUC2a3Gw" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7fjY-0007Vk-Eu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:31:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7fjX-0008Tg-9J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:31:16 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:44878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7fjX-0008TY-2e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:31:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200227172613.GB30619@jasmine.lan> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --KDy5+/kaQUC2a3Gw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:26:13PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > I'm wondering if I can just push the crates as a single commit, after > inserting them alphabetically and fixing any cosmetic issues, and also > handling the semver-compatible package updates. >=20 > I know that we don't usually do this when adding packages to an existing > module. We do add packages en masse when creating a new module. >=20 > The reason I'm asking to make an exception to our policy of one package > or update per commit are that it will be a ton of work (several full > days at least) to add software that is already working fine on the > wip-rav1e branch. >=20 It took me about 3 weeks to review ~270 patches for alacritty and it was easily more than 20 hours. > I don't see what value this additional labor will give to Guix users, > including developers. At least, I don't think the value of individual > commits will outweigh the value of my labor in this case. >=20 > What do you all think? I suppose it's not that much different than updating all the GHC packages in one go, except that they're more interconnected. I suppose we could throw them all into the crates-io module and then hack on all 270 packages at once in a separate branch. That certainly would be easier than adding them one at a time. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --KDy5+/kaQUC2a3Gw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl5ZFgIACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1FNoQ//TYdk3zjfQyGrEA8CsWc+F4bqhhet7KtzsgR7S93cga1oM4Yqvi1Rlbqm YbLBMJF6+A4qN7fWKZAY7R4M1dGTqmULDsF1K7xyuPQ3OOZ/NsavAFLkrix7eSBu fBJC8IMK6O+bDRP0OiXn3vttfd9qTxSJU0SgtCq4ar8RBb8202KHt7u95183Ea9s 3zjFgQm45k5J9hdBgR2t66GQxhd1TyufpI94Z13LQyoVGTnHh0u18bMOcmHZJjp0 sMWCH8d4UaPlVhwVmG+D66MI+Sh+UIwPvSYJEdYBwo/pn8TrfZnnV35ygzOe3byt +ntHn7At0FA48YfBZ3CGqgPLsRrST1z/nYYhs+frZGDQZDoFA9NVOwNct2fhQXrL SoGSGQ1LcVqSUzMKiPpXnE8ArtzCwI0sNdZtVPoLfJQSPXjuI+B2as7+3AUEa94Y VzNfPF7wIEf0Etpt6zMGbBM6kVG4bA5eG0vPDQv39+BdUHYc2b3jLSguSw84pDcZ q27okk4g1wc2FedeoAcdnogKtQDxWhoN4VBBpFwR33M1IokFwXGYLQs21qSccgod MZ8wPUBoZwLT1NcxFEldYo3xPxd5Qy9MAUiLzqD3HkcUwnKqW7rFfwTDGdUGaBm9 fmCRCCIEv2AhhMU4+GrbUiEspa/6AydY+Me0pUFWeahvYu/5+iQ= =E4Gw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KDy5+/kaQUC2a3Gw--