From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1zni-0008UC-L3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:44:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1zne-0006uP-Od for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:44:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1zne-0006ty-Go for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:44:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1zne-0003ht-Dx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:44:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39570] go: update to 1.13 Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:43:02 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200212214302.GA20114@jasmine.lan> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jack Hill Cc: 39570@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 02:45:27PM -0500, Jack Hill wrote: > I believe that in Go 1.13, the upstream issued that lead to excessive > references being maintained in go programs [2] has been fixed, but I did not > undo our workaround. I wonder, should it be a goal to undo it? It's not idiomatic for Guix, but it is for Go. I had stopped thinking of it as a workaround. > With 1.13 the behavior of `go get` changed to download packages from > Google's mirror at proxy.golang.org by default [3] as opposed to directly > from upstream. This is configurable by users, and I don't think it is a FSDG > issue (if it is, I think it would be on privacy grounds), but we could > change the default behavior if needed. I don't see any issues here.