From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iyuzz-00033J-Ht for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 05:00:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iyuzy-0006jF-G9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 05:00:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iyuzy-0006hQ-Ah for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 05:00:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iyuzy-0000Qt-84 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 05:00:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39384] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-rg. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:58:51 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: <20200204095851.GA19864@E5400> References: <87v9oqrr0q.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <878slmc640.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pnexrrwf.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <20200202184757.GH9517@E5400> <87o8ugs5fu.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8ugs5fu.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: "LaFreniere, Joseph" Cc: 39384@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:41:41PM -0600, LaFreniere, Joseph wrote: >=20 > Efraim Flashner writes: > > Is it possible to patch the invocations of `rg` to refer to ripgrep > > directly? >=20 > Thank you for the input, but I don't understand what you mean by "referri= ng > to ripgrep directly". Can you elaborate on that proposal and how it would > help resolve the question of whether to include ripgrep as a propagated > input? We want to have ripgrep as a regular input, so at the point in the code where it searches through PATH for the rg binary we patch it to refer to the specific binary. One example of this is in (gnu packages emacs-xyz), with emacs-nov-el. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl45QFgACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1Hpvg//TcS2ZHFR5xHLa3ZhrzMG7T+fLCyUDdVJ7PYF+uQXoAMYMywjNHz4jXqy ILVDTAZ41toGSgE6YcxL9nyfXUdCsGEVAyJutjKpZZ3p1XHtUTX7phA+z7+kNzFJ nxMvqlxG3xvLNhSJ1LUKR8YoXTlZpHIlyc4M9dTIMqthJ2OEHsmiy75uxmiqGQxP pRp9QUl2V7mg1laXKr1dQaS6IWz2aZpCg/2eT8DPhXPWGIkKg+rcuEpLZiBqjD/x DqvK1e3upD2oRo5dR83mTi8mpZi9Pl1j1as8xJgSPbFY1RlTUrP5JNGHGUZ1YR3T 38m+9NHVVbI8sc3JESrGsTPoCfNeU1RKyvjoIz2Du0EmFa8mlTbpt/XobdoK4OZW SxHWu7KCcKSxlO8I00SnEvDlEB3ADPhUoKcMUte+LM8QGSLRW4q4G+UNm+sIgKaQ Q0m5zMZeCrTaM2Bk8H8VvocQXbmlYjPsIUujWNa3ryb0aqpS05/I8OcDDgKi+Jgc q/0rzqxIJkpd5TxDsRiK3+1pZXCCPPH7J7mXyKfnw7nY4qwRfOZ4mUEOsXmNq8Pk Q1r5pYcxr5/oZCrWuQKR755TwCM6zmEFwDL2CW5TekoSx1Fm8Ygk1ZPKqFm9Kbuz tm2/ySUsIavvFk6B0xY+NSC/1KgwMnl7d3BNZc+DMEk61l2MxKY= =P4dZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--