From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bengt Richter Subject: bug#38422: Bug status? '.png' files with executable permissions Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:28:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20200122022830.GA22138@LionPure> References: Reply-To: Bengt Richter Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43479) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iu5lR-0008MZ-Gz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:29:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iu5lP-0007e3-DF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:29:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iu5lO-0007dR-8d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:29:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iu5lO-0005lK-3z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:29:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: zimoun Cc: 38422@debbugs.gnu.org Hi zimoun, On +2020-01-22 01:22:45 +0100, zimoun wrote: > Dear Bengt, > > The bug report [1] points out files with unexpected permission; based > on extension filename. > > [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38422 > > > It is not an security issue or the Guix packager did not carefully > check the validity of these files. > > If you are security paranoid, you *have to* check by yourself all the > files using "guix build -S" because in paranoid mode you cannot trust > Guix packagers (and Guix committers neither). > > > In normal mode, 2 options: > > a- propose a patch to change the permission for each offending package > b- report upstream > > Well, at least these 3 packages docbook-xsl, faba-icon-theme, and > moka-icon-theme comes with unexpected .png file permission. > > > On the long term, I am not convinced that adding automatic check and > permission change based on filename extension would really add Quality > Assurance. Because we are speaking about quality, not security. > > > I am inclined to close this bug. What do you think? > > All the best, > simon Ok with me to close, thanks. -- Regards, Bengt Richter