From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marco van Hulten <marco@hulten.org>
Subject: Re: TeX Live 2019 wanted
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:25:23 +0100
Message-ID: <20200121112523.3849a698@gfi063209.klientdrift.uib.no>
References: <878smdyn36.fsf@elephly.net> <87blr3f4v0.fsf@kryshen.net>
 <87d0bixy4z.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35460)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <marco@hulten.org>) id 1itqj5-00058f-Vu
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:25:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <marco@hulten.org>) id 1itqj4-000658-VI
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:25:39 -0500
Received: from alfons.uib.no ([2001:700:200:30::141]:54330)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <marco@hulten.org>) id 1itqj4-0005yh-4A
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:25:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87d0bixy4z.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On 17 Jan 09:53 Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Mikhail Kryshen <mikhail@kryshen.net> writes:
>=20
> > - font files are missing from texlive-latex-lh (shouldn't it be
> > called texlive-lh?). =20
>=20
> Thank you, that=E2=80=99s a good one.  Generally, the texlive-latex-* pac=
kages
> are of the old type that may very well be incomplete.  I=E2=80=99ll repla=
ce
> this one with texlive-lh which will include all the source files as it
> should.

TeX Live is a full TeX distribution that includes TeX and variants as
well as the macro packages LaTeX and ConTeXt.  lh is LaTeX-specific, I
think.

It could be fine if any CTAN package is included in TeX Live as
"texlive-PACKAGENAME"; just wondering if this is done consistently and
with good reason.

=E2=80=94Marco