From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>
Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 01:13:28 +0100
Message-ID: <20200104011328.5c5ab586@kompiuter>
References: <20191215211230.66fea79e@interia.pl> <875zihclep.fsf@elephly.net>
 <20191222002815.4db8e9ca@interia.pl> <87d0cgpzqo.fsf@elephly.net>
 <20191223204317.3069e8ba@kompiuter>
 <20191225023416.0b36b90c@kompiuter>
 <20191227195731.6b869970@interia.pl>
 <CAE4v=phL+JrTnOihad+w=zC1+5Tz4jwHpdejiD3mY2tckmJdRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191227224639.5b7d1e74@interia.pl> <8736d4kcue.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <20200101162246.677552a6@kompiuter> <87tv5d2gn1.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57468)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1inX4i-0002vT-Bk
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:13:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1inX4h-0007jf-8h
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:13:52 -0500
Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.239]:46300)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>)
 id 1inX4g-0007We-LY
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:13:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87tv5d2gn1.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:33:38 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:

> That=E2=80=99s very unlikely as we would probably see errors like this in=
 most
> packages then.
>=20
> cogl issues an optimized instruction (__memcpy_ssse3), which then
> fails.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m just guessing, but I wonder if this comment is a hint at what=
=E2=80=99s
> wrong here:
>=20
>     ;; NOTE: mutter exports a bundled fork of cogl, so when making
> changes to ;; cogl, corresponding changes may be appropriate in
> mutter as well.
>=20
> cogl is up to date, but mutter is not (it=E2=80=99s tied to the current G=
nome
> version in Guix, which is a few releases behind).
>=20
> It may also be interesting to see if this can be reproduced on
> Wayland.
>=20
> --
> Ricardo
>=20

I'll check it on wayland then. Anyway the bug is also present in our
current version, can I send paches containing my current changes then?


Jan Wielkiewicz