From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: new micro release to address bug 36074 for new binary installs on foreign distributions with systemd Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 20:21:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20200102202133.4c3ba252@scratchpost.org> References: <1577957308.3476.40.camel@gmail.com> <6076C4B7-8396-4993-91A6-92BCFBD23F07@lepiller.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Mi_m.upSmu/KlrKrOWpwsia"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1in62V-0000QG-2i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 14:21:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1in62T-0001pF-Ui for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 14:21:46 -0500 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:41684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1in62T-0001m5-NE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 14:21:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6076C4B7-8396-4993-91A6-92BCFBD23F07@lepiller.eu> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Calvin Heim --Sig_/Mi_m.upSmu/KlrKrOWpwsia Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Julien, On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 11:07:47 -0500 Julien Lepiller wrote: > Instead of a release from the master branch, maybe we can apply the fix o= n top of the version-1.0.1 branch and release that? That way we won't need = the build farms to rebuild anything, while fixing the issue. We could also = apply patches to the graphical installer that were pushed after 1.0.1 maybe? There were also changes to the DVD bootloader (grub-mkrescue) which would be important to release. In any case, I'm doubtful whether fixing version-1.0.1 branch buys us much. Why not just release a new version from master? Is it broken? --Sig_/Mi_m.upSmu/KlrKrOWpwsia Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl4OQr0ACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUbygf+LPhK1r9cZNtrnD8015yWODlXcUKCBRRJu+j2/BhdD9gd+rV0Gd7rHzDl baEb/iIbUxleD8VKdgjXH1GD7YK2+AnRB6BSRT8HUHeCqfJZ129xC6peN97oeZYH DEeY9ZdKjf6JYlv/lSkoPTrWxD/Q7ikgkbMKh+Pnc4X21wgjcr6o3mY95SQGo3uR Pujy5i8PMfLLDv+VTAw7Xka5wC+XHvWBrx7hRVx7EQB565c7OtkUw3ZJ/vG3r9BU GeFazpvbsbzkfqeKr6FU5Cl3b4hOsYJ0GOJ/+l3JADH6kDuAgSkwOrC3swCfuiWE ozDUeouIOVhz12KjsVeurOT/P6pHwA== =QgH5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Mi_m.upSmu/KlrKrOWpwsia--