From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco van Hulten Subject: Re: xdm Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:52:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20191203155248.0b2e7f5f@gfi063209.klientdrift.uib.no> References: <20191022154858.306e1deb@gfi063209.klientdrift.uib.no> <20191126140628.lngiqib4hfo76gwq@uptimegirl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9YA-0005xo-Tk for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:53:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9Y4-0007Zf-OD for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:53:09 -0500 Received: from alfons.uib.no ([2001:700:200:30::141]:55829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic9Y3-0006ye-Tu for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 09:53:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20191126140628.lngiqib4hfo76gwq@uptimegirl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: ng0@n0.is Cc: help-guix@gnu.org On 26 Nov 14:06 ng0 wrote: > I have bits of an xdm package somewhere in my vault/archive of > "packages to send to guix once I find time to contribute again". >=20 > What makes it more complicated / time consuming with xdm is that > you need to figure out the service for it. >=20 > If you or anyone else wants to work on it, I can send a patch (external, = not applying to > guix.git). To be honest, I have not allocated enough time for Guix development for any significant contribution like an xdm package. I hope 2020 will be better. I hope someone else wants to work on it before that time (but in my current Guix installations the desktop manager, whichever this is, works properly). In any case, I can make time for testing Guix code if that is useful at all. > Fwiw, I looked at the work OpenBSD does with their X11 patching (for more= time than I am willing to admit), > and it's not worth to extract and re-apply the meaningful patches > for one single project. I don't get why parabola is re-purposing this X11= work, > but OpenBSD work is usually written for OpenBSD with an underlying OpenBSD > system in mind. That's not to say their X11 is "useless", it's just useful > in OpenBSD. Point taken. Seems reasonable. =E2=80=94Marco