From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Guix and FSDG Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:26:13 +0000 Message-ID: <20191122152613.6morwodqtv4zvr4j@uptimegirl> References: <91c877cfe5d19d192b53da2c7cd2a741c30a37f7.camel@disroot.org> <20191122145958.zfwljwiw43jl4cat@uptimegirl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iYApC-0004hj-N5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:26:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYApB-00051c-Ee for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:26:22 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:59124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYApB-000513-8N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:26:21 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.202] (helo=mailfront20.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iYAp8-0001Zh-Lz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:26:18 +0100 Received: by mailfront20.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (882477)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1iYAp4-0002wa-9h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:26:14 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191122145958.zfwljwiw43jl4cat@uptimegirl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, I'm sorry for my last reply. At least it makes sense to get the definition right this time as this is a reoccuring topic. So whatever comes out of this should hopefully be enough to write about it. What threw me off was yet another email which CC'd many lists plus one individual person.