From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#38295: manual-config php-fpm mismatch Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:11:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20191121101151.GB15074@E5400> References: <20191120104343.GS15074@E5400> <871ru2v9i8.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eN+VsUY52o/CFM+1" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXjST-0003vE-2X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:13:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXjSS-000646-42 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:13:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXjSQ-00063f-Es for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:13:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXjSQ-0008Qk-9O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:13:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871ru2v9i8.fsf@nckx> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 38295-done@debbugs.gnu.org --eN+VsUY52o/CFM+1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 04:43:27PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug rep= orts for GNU Guix wrote: > Efraim, >=20 > Efraim Flashner =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > In (gnu services web) for it says that default > > for 'socket-group' is "nginx". In the manual, in 8.8.16 (Web Services), > > it says the socket-group default is php-fpm. >=20 > Good catch. >=20 I've been hanging out in that code for the past week or so and I find I can move around the code faster than the manual in a webpage. > > Obviously when deploying the code trumps the manual, but what is it > > supposed to be? >=20 > I think the code should follow the manual. More privsep =3D=3D better. After some searching I didn't see an nginx user or group so there's another reason. I'll go ahead and patch it. >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > T G-R --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --eN+VsUY52o/CFM+1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIyBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl3WYucACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1FwVQ/4r1hGxP+K9Hto/UauU7MBmx9aQRPsNKs8IVMmwsWBhZYzQJeVwzVkPukc L/A0PuqR6bFe9lqM1rPdNgqXKS6ZVOG9DMrjLmR8tZ2HgqBS+OqabTp4++fcEKU1 bUimOsdrMj6KPI8QqcHNLmSo4I/YGG5nj0rNcG5k+x1ZMTmqB40XuqHJWDKb+RG+ Ihe6I/h5lj/WPhOCGyZk1DWk7xxMJ11eucXXwJV7N+g1pN20DziSYNmKxqt2tbB1 onYbJCrpYc476QR6ImPRZQi32yBO25WQFVFU6l0aLaKbx4l45EGkXZBJYGjW1Uo6 2TRVF34mBOz/mNy5p+CTJ+SeynWP6DU5YcRFb3xPq+ofFcCLIhEN5ZlxFfpiNI1D ct4dx2fy6EzuZINgxqJ731+1j4pF8ty7VN7TIQDh2qGQiYsX+v9IAJ+yqNdobHko hH8vGJElvfMufmKYd70UN8htbIplUZamSRaRjD5lgy++hSI+9Z5iCfSXX3ZFe96r Sy535wu8PN22zDxHg/9YAUGmpH1ObWHQW167zi967Mke//pCaOFkj10dk4TuiHwd JcenD8E8qpWirlqtXUlr4jjyoJY00K91Z3SxetQD93RZfvosyt+O4+aq5vePgITw ym71Ni6DJaTvl2dYmSrDI0zd7dhzTXWcrGWaGfAywpzevmq7qQ== =zn2d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eN+VsUY52o/CFM+1--