From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Subject: bug#38055: none Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:19:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20191112051931.GQ17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> References: <20191109182510.GA3954@E5400> <87k1873jjh.fsf@gnu.org> <20191111092730.GF3954@E5400> <20191111151010.GO17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUObv-0006wu-Nt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:21:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUObu-0001ow-Ji for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:21:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUObu-0001os-GT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:21:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUObu-00047m-At for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:21:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191111151010.GO17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Cc: 38055-done@debbugs.gnu.org Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2019-11-11 10:10:10 -0500) wrote: > Efraim Flashner (2019-11-11 11:27:30 +0200) wrote: > > > Some inline comments added. Patch pushed. > > […] I'll try to find a moment to test your patch and see if the `ipfs` > binary doesn't segfault, then report back. […] I tried your patch, the following command in a pure container environment: $ patchelf --set-interpreter "$(patchelf --print-interpreter /bin/sh)" /path/to/bin/go does not trigger the assertion error (both `--set-interpreter` and `--set-rpath` suffered from the same failure), and the resulting `go` binary can be executed without issues. Thank you very much for fixing this! `:)` -- Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/