From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#26302: [website] translations Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:11:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20191105111112.xfryncx6ut3ggqaj@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20170329154040.ddscahwp2agknihb@abyayala> <16d07cb5a1d.ca69255821627.8144164908931126811@zoho.com> <20190908171638.cna67eearj4rbn2k@pelzflorian.localdomain> <16d18a5a9e8.12ab66c8254154.2756956535677606704@zoho.com> <20190915201819.3yxm25fayvbxwdpl@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20191007081502.wog4q4wjptvhmejf@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874kznbqa5.fsf@gnu.org> <20191102131515.sq6mlvwsfybagsd2@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87ftj38spn.fsf@gnu.org> <20191105073130.j5eft6jgqhkcnqf3@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="x66vhsc7qsnxhm5g" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41055) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRwkl-0006ur-Ex for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:12:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRwkk-00054X-CV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:12:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRwkk-00053i-8w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:12:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iRwkj-0008Tm-Uw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 06:12:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191105073130.j5eft6jgqhkcnqf3@pelzflorian.localdomain> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: sirgazil , 26302 <26302@debbugs.gnu.org> --x66vhsc7qsnxhm5g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:31:30AM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > +Note that @command{guix build -S} compiles the sources only of the > +specified package. Another try, I changed s/package/packages/ (attached). Regards, Florian --x66vhsc7qsnxhm5g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-doc-Explain-more-licensing-aspects-of-the-source-bui.patch" >From a5d9180d960d244053bea0d59d6092060fe4c6dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Pelz Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:08:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/13] doc: Explain more licensing aspects of the '--source' build option. * doc/guix.texi (Additional Build Options): Explain more. --- doc/guix.texi | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index da2423b422..d8886fa494 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -8328,6 +8328,13 @@ The returned source tarball is the result of applying any patches and code snippets specified in the package @code{origin} (@pxref{Defining Packages}). +Note that @command{guix build -S} compiles the sources only of the +specified packages. They do not include the sources of statically +linked dependencies, dynamically linked dependencies, or any other +dependencies. When distributing complete corresponding sources for +license compliance, you may want to play it safe and use the following +@code{--sources} option instead. + @item --sources Fetch and return the source of @var{package-or-derivation} and all their dependencies, recursively. This is a handy way to obtain a local copy -- 2.23.0 --x66vhsc7qsnxhm5g--