From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#37882: [PATCH] build-system/linux-module: Accept a #:make-flags keyword. Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20191027081806.GA1540@E5400> References: <20191023080658.GF20347@E5400> <20191025193731.4794-1-me@tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOdlR-0000qk-BL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 04:19:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOdlP-0005WF-65 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 04:19:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOdlO-0005VN-4B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 04:19:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOdlN-00020J-Sh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 04:19:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191025193731.4794-1-me@tobias.gr> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 37882@debbugs.gnu.org --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:37:31PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug rep= orts for GNU Guix wrote: > * guix/build-system/linux-module.scm (linux-module-build): Accept a > MAKE-FLAGS argument. > : Pass it on. > --- >=20 > Efraim, >=20 > Is this in any way related to the topic coming up on IRC last week, or ju= st a coincidence? >=20 > In any case, I'd written the following simple fix but never merged it bec= ause I have yet to meet a module with a legitimate need for it. It works, = though. >=20 I thought I had a use-case for it but it turns out I'm pretty sure I didn't need it in the end. It was more of surprise that it was in one place and not another. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl21Ur0ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1Erdg//d44HunkHSqrPdYn1f1N0gl5IpIKATjimSd9CSF2br+74zPoRbJeZ8/TO YGhc0bYQhiXqHb5adMU0BoKg4+fBxOTpW4r/ZhiDyhZe1grJ1oDbQ6ctgvzuqhLb u9lVqxOYUcC4BxlPErMWaXnp4tDfSMfKpBpbtZNJ3OHcP6bafvUes0DJFRyJeoJk wnLsNCej0eIQ1d+qAacQnQZaCKiwqtaByH3dB+wLzmquGnyV5dXV4qu903yqdpCI 15Qt9CjoKQB4nqRwgJqcppykj5019NVuaElneOU2Bh5qEewwE1N3qwC5a9CDz5yf PfYV92seYxtppEqhCJcdte+cOfCVf0RwaeCyRlhQbHRl2kJBpIJlacTPyZP4tNhZ 0/u68UkFjfm300Asoj7NAruDRPOeUwDkol0SzWbQyZG7ZaNaq4gRxnWk9XQZAsJ4 cvKg8ixvYR2s8IKrjifV1m5677hGgrvB9tK1fu/A+9xbR3C8H8O8oHm4uFLnO/z6 2lbqg0i4hG8ua4NQHh+yal3wCVtQmC9lPQx1XWyBFyOou/X04zTq0B0Selyyh2EW 4TpT4s23yX0WFuligN0yxwmOru7eQATnNITX5EHEoGzZt0tpYMHjRPAinkj++7p2 HTuuwSqWHBAXmmpi5K2VbhTki9A5hSsWmjgu5405Hsz8qRfFSnE= =7o2j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--