From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tanguy Le Carrour Subject: Re: gnu: profanity: Modify build options. Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:43:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20191025124350.an35vgryo3wlv6p7@rafflesia> References: <20191025095547.qywu6lgz46fh6hdn@rafflesia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNywe-00084y-8w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:43:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNywd-00089e-0E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:43:56 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:51259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNywc-000874-QK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:43:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= Boskovits Cc: Guix-devel Le 10/25, Gábor Boskovits a écrit : > Tanguy Le Carrour ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 25., > Pén 11:59): > > > Hi Guix! > > > > Yesterday, I submitted a patch to update Profanity [1]. > > > > [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37903 > > > > My motivation was not to get the latest version of the software, but to > > get the OMEMO encryption feature! This was only possible with versions > > > 0.6. > > > > The question is now to know if I can/should modify the package's build > > options and dependencies to enable OMEMO? I guess it make sense to have > > encryption available by default. > > > > Another thing I would like to do is to enable profanity's "desktop" > > features, > > namely tray icon and notifications. Would it make sense to activate it > > by default? Would it be better to create a `profanity-desktop` package > > that modify the dependencies and the options?! > > > Usually the default package comes with as much functionality as possible. > You could do a minimal package OK, I'll work on that when Profanity 0.7 is available. -- Tanguy