From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44350)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iLRii-0004ZX-J0
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:51:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iLRig-0001C1-9G
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:51:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40711)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iLRig-0001Bo-5q
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:51:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iLRig-0004rE-48
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:51:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#37613] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-httpie.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37613.B37613.157140301918611@debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:50:15 +0200
From: Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org>
Message-ID: <20191018125015.lawklnqyxxrljq7c@rafflesia>
References: <20191004065520.tcuz74tsjgqfbh6q@rafflesia>
 <20191014114320.fmiev2vxisikagf7@rafflesia>
 <878spj6sfu.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <878spj6sfu.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>
Cc: 37613@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Oleg!


Le 10/17, Oleg Pykhalov a écrit :
> What do you think about naming the package “httpie” instead, because
> it's intended to run by calling ‘httpie’ command as in ‘youtube-dl’
> package?  I could change the name if you don't mind and push it.

I have no opinion on this! I package cookiecutter as
`python-cookiecutter`, so I did the same with httpie.
The only problem is that the binary is actually called `http`.

Just do whatever you think is best!

Should I consider doing the same for the package `python-poetry` I've submitted?!

Regards,

-- 
Tanguy