From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Question about sbcl-package->ecl-package Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:47:45 +0300 Message-ID: <20191016124745.GH1014@E5400> References: <871rvdujku.fsf@yamatai> <87k194zyt6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0Ed1hDcWxc3B7cn" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKiih-0006rD-MG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:48:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKiig-0006gK-Hy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:48:03 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:57386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKiie-0006cq-7N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:48:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k194zyt6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --y0Ed1hDcWxc3B7cn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:59:01PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I've encountered the same problem a couple of times. > If you try to compile ecl-dexador, you'll see it fails because it does > not re-use the arguments of sbcl-dexador which patches out a failing > test. >=20 > Something is wrong in sbcl-package->ecl-package. > Andy? >=20 > That said, it's not a very big deal, since the cl- package works for all = compilers. >=20 Sounds like the conversion isn't "recursive enough". On a per-package basis you can replace the created ecl package with the real one. The better option would be to look at how python defines python2- variants, which sounds a lot like the problem you're having here. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --y0Ed1hDcWxc3B7cn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl2nEXEACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EJKA//UQFUn5XSGjOTtKBHG+yAWm7wo1TlyOK+xFKukuAS96n3TWqNgv128YVK wHBvtrOC6kkUPGlILMwFggYGLHl1QIY2/Vp3hYDDqT2OQidyEX7ygF8bxBJigJv+ wO/5HFI0td3j2V93OvWVsqUgUZyb87se72onaM9iwGjTYKiDJu4zet+84BK2KkP9 6z92ijNiU9NebypZkF6SdQaEKJ+JoFRkOHWPAr5QUpaqN5tO/FfQsPqWtgHgaa4C sE+eyCnnfdNxcN3uplmvjrX7a8shh6Y/NgGYj1dbuJS96PRzyYima7WJH1i+SfSJ pDucgN3SVJlNl8/ptsR+//oMvWTTK7+pWzn4bP+tQpgdqXhQMJ8v9UXIQGQY+6co QTUrywkCBWlTCjjZxov65lNYNkVfrfIOECpDXxMrevChox+JySlB5Wxb4/QbHwO5 D2Pvrn8/5SELVJF61vSGtOr6paUeZz/wzgxU4q+VzdTH79GKk+x/XNEgs4PGT8nO ELXxbVtYWk2zDLwnzDEACFKCKpm1BfdhNVPFka0svqaJBz0e5lXIborBidWVObt1 AGJk3Vl0TjYQHg7byYOwtcgjYwVxrCXwEnYK9Kp8bjPkCx3VxIKoPW50gf4hn1pt weS2c2pW28fx0boFcoUPPF1WVw2xLvehLFohtvqicYdye1aKrxs= =X2Yf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0Ed1hDcWxc3B7cn--