From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: next: Compress the executable. Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:09:30 +0300 Message-ID: <20191003070930.GA17163@E5400> References: <875zm0co0t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h85ipo14.fsf@gnu.org> <87muf9n8sc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <8736gw6xrh.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2yonng4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k19tg63u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9tcm8ws.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0fjb5hi.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7an8bfy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87eezv9oo8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFvEz-00021x-Ij for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 03:09:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFvEy-00050b-Il for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 03:09:33 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:55084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFvEy-000507-Cc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 03:09:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eezv9oo8.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:01:43AM +0900, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello Pierre! >=20 > Pierre Neidhardt writes: >=20 > > True. > > > > I've been using Btrfs for my data for a little while and I'm very happy > > with it. > > > > I wonder how Btrfs fares for a Guix system. In many ways, Guix > > supersedes many of the features of Btrfs (snapshots and deduplication in > > particular). So I wonder if it's not redundant and possibly incurs a > > waste of energy. > > > > What's your experience, Maxim? >=20 > I haven't noticed much slow down (if at all?), and the 'lzo' compression > keeps the /gnu/store size 30% smaller or so. >=20 > That sums it for now, I think. >=20 What mount options do you have? I realized i have compression enabled but 'sudo compsize /gnu/store' doesn't show any compression happening. (file-system (device (file-system-label "root")) (mount-point "/") (type "btrfs") (options "autodefrag,compress=3Dlzo,discard,ssd_spread")) --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl2VnqYACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EFgg/8Cg+EZyaugSy3UsrH6xoiuYijbPQc5RY8eZWBxT3K7wCu/Z7NJ269GQ1V I4qBr4YvFwQU0hjX+bcfyorltbPJW9TZOEXX9f6rb0o8kFvLWn2POnXf0dnEfx6A ZYG8gqh/ikYIPpJimoAnonxYuxcoqd3a7KeefqvyHgoa2Eku7ukiAUkfJVdRxTmF GlBSj1Dvs6ztqiVdutU8rQtlkAILnIYSONggTx5wU9ud05ECGZCMuNQJcP6supEs 9rxon1fTntagGK+x7+RE09eznGP8oITPhgX4cUCG5cSl2NfQuow2NZOVVMgExClb ZoLedTvWhTIgbVCLlRQ2CZvDCl1+k+LzfNaMnzdnbiBLVmJFeh6rp5l1jQ7rz+iD eaCBWGUHq+3AfCOgpdWRQ0no+xCTZIvIjEXp36wy2D3achblXjMV9jglvmmuLqd7 sIH2bW1oLESRMQEYda6OXtUmRuck/BswyBGaLDHskLj3cKZtXKKD2amE4a4J4uZe y4r/0iA1GORwmWwH57fnWbU8XLUJOhf7wZRUA4IIlTVk5zeG8wYUOoaJZjHmUKyL QXjdrTSZDrTcODXK1CrDCfur8fD1FuJyenH1ngll+XJagLSBAxs4fLWdv/8zkYmd tj0mUj4KmM769XdIl1viBacc4goQEC2Fxo4v0fmuXjH6kJtVgrc= =kzkU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--