From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#37437: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:48:36 +0300 Message-ID: <20190923134836.GA11513@E5400> References: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> <20190917224936.04119c20@alma-ubu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCOi7-0006j9-SK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:49:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCOi6-0001YK-FC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:49:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54769) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCOi6-0001YG-AC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCOi6-0005AS-7U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:49:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190917224936.04119c20@alma-ubu> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: 37437@debbugs.gnu.org, Josh Holland --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > Hi Josh and Tobias, >=20 > thanks for reporting and checking. I'm very surprised someone is > already using this :-) I only added this package three days ago, that's > probably the reason why the source code is not available via hash on > ci.guix.gnu.org or any other CAN. There it failed to build due to a > dependency, though it doesn't tell which dependency if failing: >=20 > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1713420/details >=20 It's not clear, but one of the dependencies of the package is the source. So if it already changed between pushing the commit and the build farm building the package then it may have failed for that reason. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl2IzTEACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HlvBAAi0cKRkSYAsFCJiJMtjwNVtGnTIz/UmZbs7Mp0n/0BO8D23x5EexzqpBu GdvriUp+qTJi12Zz7OORv4Y35/SgwdV56/2hu1IuTm9DGaL1Nh9zz4FQNlBwxHii a6TN8tuLgsAKtJ0nrvzh17JPkXrvb6UdrZxWIacDlBKYST6gsz8BosQgHOXkN+Mj fbhN8izlWWIW9qqfps9nUP6rJmvn8ln83Uc+b3jKuJe2TK/R8CwaLPP/tyb63ocq +yJ6Q0Gx8jaFeN4EKrxyvZBhwfdSQslVhSH6vA1XrecqZXEURI7Ek3vrQTOT5HsX OBTOSSdxlknTZ/bXtg22yA4HXf2Pxg39jp0rdTt8fJI+PduIAGrKz451eUGP9pDw qA2IIpkDkcRxO8ZbZygBpMwq9+515ddAqXsvW3g+xX1yfm2CQwCKGXyzHQpyhqYI Lu0mWVFAJSsnvgSLkVefL94771TPjmYsSeOmCo+anz4eEVGle7clCR2hVFTEFt1y Ek6i1gA7xWCWR3L0+ieJu36ohxjAmdHeufQ2/Wy1tHOI2S2Xo4GgOUksEbgqQQOE ptgRcdiEz19g2rJ9Tgdhb9eX1x6U3lcgo8iwKLS7kzAQMWsk/KZd9m7UEDfyXmZF xnxk524bnO/TrsQbOqODnR6eg9kg43ZHvxWU7/V7nfq+xWw0kEk= =5sIv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--