From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ison Subject: Re: Guix beyond 1.0: =?utf-8?B?bGV04oCZcw==?= have a roadmap! Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 19:35:22 -0600 Message-ID: <20190629013522.436t4eee6q4ppaac@cf0> References: <877e97vws8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hh2HB-0006f3-U0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 21:35:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hh2HB-0001NX-2H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 21:35:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877e97vws8.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:05:27PM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > What do *you* want Guix to address in the future? How about a --with-version flag for guix build and guix package? Sort of like the convenience features --with-source and --with-input for = re-writing package fields but this would be convenient for rewriting the = package version string.