From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNEWx-0000EV-2z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 06:38:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNEWw-0007WK-1U for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 06:38:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNEWv-0007WC-TT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 06:38:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNEWv-0004HT-PF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 06:38:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#35545] [PATCH 02/17] gnu: Add java-jsonp-api. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 12:37:05 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20190505123705.1727f983@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <20190503130134.24788-2-julien@lepiller.eu> References: <20190503145820.606f37db@sybil.lepiller.eu> <20190503130134.24788-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20190503130134.24788-2-julien@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/xazWPwX.4RpwBwxIZkU_aph"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 35545@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/xazWPwX.4RpwBwxIZkU_aph Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 3 May 2019 15:01:19 +0200 Julien Lepiller wrote: > * gnu/packages/java.scm (java-jsonp-api): New variable. > +(define-public java-jsonp-api > + (package > + (name "java-jsonp-api") > + (version "1.1.5") > + (home-page "https://javaee.github.io/jsonp/") New Homepage since Eclipse took over JEE es here: https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/jsonp/ > + (license (list license:gpl2 > + license:epl2.0)))) Could you clarify that it is EPL _or_ GPL, and that it is GPL+classpath exception? Would it make sense to have its own entry in the license module for GPL+classpath-exception in general? Though when searching through the GNU licenses pages I havn't found a special entry for that. Otherwise, LGTM. Thanks, Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/xazWPwX.4RpwBwxIZkU_aph Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCXM680QAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /XLWAJ9mQ9KRtlBVvzjxu3d8j49TcoXH8wCguXlzWGpJp/LAq1kZX04HBHohqX0= =vKpH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xazWPwX.4RpwBwxIZkU_aph--