From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#35539: Add more release testing automation for Guix releases Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 20:50:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20190503185007.56eyemvqa2pgjjkv@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190503085053.e43lzfuczs3vsswp@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87r29fetwd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdGx-0002bX-Bs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:51:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdGw-0004tY-GH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:51:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdGw-0004tK-Ci for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:51:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdGw-0001vp-AU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:51:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r29fetwd.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 35539@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:04:18PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I agree we need more automation here. One way to do this would be > something like ‘make assert-binaries-available’, which checks for > substitute availability (it could be a prerequisite of ‘make dist’), > where we’d explicitly check for DEs on x86_64 and i686. That would be > an improvement, though it’d still be quite handcrafted. > > Ludo’. This overlaps with the need for (eventually) a stable branch, I think. Regards, Florian