From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56059) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLXAo-0005Jh-Br for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:08:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLWx8-0003VJ-5j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:54:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLWx8-0003V9-3J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hLWx7-0007le-VO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:54:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#35483] gnu: u-boot-tools: Only run full test suite on x86. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:52:54 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20190430195254.2a45be31@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <87pnp4wfon.fsf@ponder> References: <87ef5lbh38.fsf@ponder> <87pnp4wfon.fsf@ponder> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/aZs46T8Y_dbWbzR1ZOD8vb0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: 35483@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/aZs46T8Y_dbWbzR1ZOD8vb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Vagrant, Hi Ludo, On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:32:40 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > I neglected to mention in my initial submission that the test suite has > failed on non-x86 architectures since I started testing u-boot on Guix a > year or so ago... >=20 > It blocks working support for veyron-speedy/Asus C201, and that would be > very nice to have fixed for 1.0, of course! >=20 > I may need to update the patch to exclude i686-linux from the full test > suite, as it seems with u-boot 2019.04 to also fail with 32-bit x86 > making some 64-bit assumptions... >=20 > Thanks for the review, if you can! I've reviewed it and found that also on i686 tests are not succeeding. So I've changed the check to only enable the respective parts of the tests for x86_64 and pushed it to guix master as commit 6f5be83cd7158e678602d62c27f26363df3e1649. Thanks! I'm not sure whether I should still cherry-pick it for 1.0, so I didn't yet. --Sig_/aZs46T8Y_dbWbzR1ZOD8vb0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlzIi3YACgkQ5xo1VCww uqVS1gf/Xcqbprz4jOAfL5WJxt1qTCWA5LSCNJ/Jfe9UNwrwzXHBr8UDlhz8SkK0 Zni/zatJLm0VsF/QlAeV0W1Hwdb6mt4DoxQjHqbU9K7cEvLhcSf7ndLU7ok5fV0r PcItM9xFWdpKEJCoAZ7sXaHvVusyG1zi4a6TWQ9jvNEA5S8JxBd+QhRmIpARQC1E zRq72utO4SsTUVBsqutN28SAS/XQUvxh2pTBcTV8jPHq5HG4epIsa83we+nLR7gy fNkzNJ97i9atQWcVxDMrg72bvOvBBiPoyonyIxQnYHFtdoYhtCL2GgVqPyRhXg7g BF9k5S0KgGTypUE8qpivkA5XFPIaKQ== =RHVB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/aZs46T8Y_dbWbzR1ZOD8vb0--