fuse & sshfs

fuse & sshfs

[Brett Gilio]

Hi all,

With 1.0 around the corner, is there any priority for packages like
fuse? The latest release is 3.5 and we are using 2.9.

All of these packages depend on it
casync@2 multipath-tools@0.7.9 fio@3.13 python-llfuse@0.41.1
python-fusepy@2.0.4 python2-gdrivefs@0.14.9 python2-llfuse@1.3.5
borg@1.1.9 skopeo@0.1.28 flatpak@1.2.4 unionfs-fuse@2.0 fuseiso@20070708
fuse-exfat@1.3.0 archivemount@0.8.12 sshfs@2.10 testdisk@7.0 ifuse@1.1.3
spacefm@1.0.6 caja-extensions@1.22.0 mate@1.22.0 lxde@0.99.2
gnome-tweak-tool@3.26.4 gnome@3.24.3 httpfs2@0.1.5 curlftpfs@0.9.2
disorderfs@0.5.6 apfs-fuse@0.0.0-0.c7036a3 encfs@1.9.5 sra-tools@2.9.3
wimlib@1.13.0

Is it maybe lingering in one of our unmerged branches out there? If not,
I wouldn't mind trying to take a crack at bumping it. I know for a fact
that not updating it limits out ability to upgrade sshfs since it
depends on version >3.

Best

Brett Gilio

Re: fuse & sshfs

[Efraim Flashner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1590 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:31:20PM -0500, Brett Gilio wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> With 1.0 around the corner, is there any priority for packages like
> fuse? The latest release is 3.5 and we are using 2.9.
> 
> All of these packages depend on it
> casync@2 multipath-tools@0.7.9 fio@3.13 python-llfuse@0.41.1
> python-fusepy@2.0.4 python2-gdrivefs@0.14.9 python2-llfuse@1.3.5
> borg@1.1.9 skopeo@0.1.28 flatpak@1.2.4 unionfs-fuse@2.0 fuseiso@20070708
> fuse-exfat@1.3.0 archivemount@0.8.12 sshfs@2.10 testdisk@7.0 ifuse@1.1.3
> spacefm@1.0.6 caja-extensions@1.22.0 mate@1.22.0 lxde@0.99.2
> gnome-tweak-tool@3.26.4 gnome@3.24.3 httpfs2@0.1.5 curlftpfs@0.9.2
> disorderfs@0.5.6 apfs-fuse@0.0.0-0.c7036a3 encfs@1.9.5 sra-tools@2.9.3
> wimlib@1.13.0
> 
> Is it maybe lingering in one of our unmerged branches out there? If not,
> I wouldn't mind trying to take a crack at bumping it. I know for a fact
> that not updating it limits out ability to upgrade sshfs since it
> depends on version >3.
> 
> Best
> 
> Brett Gilio
> 

I looked into bumping it a while ago and I ended up down a rabbit hole I
didn't really want to venture into. Don't really remember much beyond
that unfortunately.

I looked into bumping it a while ago and I ended up down a rabbit hole I
didn't really want to venture into. Don't really remember much beyond
that unfortunately.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: fuse & sshfs

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]

Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I looked into bumping it a while ago and I ended up down a 
> rabbit hole I
> didn't really want to venture into. Don't really remember much 
> beyond
> that unfortunately.

Hah, me too!  Probably a longer while ago.

I wonder how many other people-hours have vanished down this exact 
same hole.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]