Re: fuse & sshfs

[Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1590 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:31:20PM -0500, Brett Gilio wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> With 1.0 around the corner, is there any priority for packages like
> fuse? The latest release is 3.5 and we are using 2.9.
> 
> All of these packages depend on it
> casync@2 multipath-tools@0.7.9 fio@3.13 python-llfuse@0.41.1
> python-fusepy@2.0.4 python2-gdrivefs@0.14.9 python2-llfuse@1.3.5
> borg@1.1.9 skopeo@0.1.28 flatpak@1.2.4 unionfs-fuse@2.0 fuseiso@20070708
> fuse-exfat@1.3.0 archivemount@0.8.12 sshfs@2.10 testdisk@7.0 ifuse@1.1.3
> spacefm@1.0.6 caja-extensions@1.22.0 mate@1.22.0 lxde@0.99.2
> gnome-tweak-tool@3.26.4 gnome@3.24.3 httpfs2@0.1.5 curlftpfs@0.9.2
> disorderfs@0.5.6 apfs-fuse@0.0.0-0.c7036a3 encfs@1.9.5 sra-tools@2.9.3
> wimlib@1.13.0
> 
> Is it maybe lingering in one of our unmerged branches out there? If not,
> I wouldn't mind trying to take a crack at bumping it. I know for a fact
> that not updating it limits out ability to upgrade sshfs since it
> depends on version >3.
> 
> Best
> 
> Brett Gilio
> 

I looked into bumping it a while ago and I ended up down a rabbit hole I
didn't really want to venture into. Don't really remember much beyond
that unfortunately.

I looked into bumping it a while ago and I ended up down a rabbit hole I
didn't really want to venture into. Don't really remember much beyond
that unfortunately.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]