From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>
Subject: Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:57:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20190419145728.kcdlbbiyueqtbiy4@pelzflorian.localdomain>
References: <20190419093946.ulyjiaeodukk4rru@pelzflorian.localdomain>
	<9484672957134939490@scdbackup.webframe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36593)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>) id 1hHUxK-0001Fl-3d
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:57:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>) id 1hHUxJ-0005HS-91
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:57:34 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9484672957134939490@scdbackup.webframe.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net>
Cc: bug-xorriso@gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:58:58PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> The youngest without "Secure" in its bootx64.efi is
>   debian-7.7.0-amd64-netinst.iso
> 
> You could check whether this hangs like Guix.
> 

No, it does not hang, it is bootable.


> SHA512:
>   5cb6e4fea55fbb5173f90c3a545b843c6c193e29c3aa32b3306c9bbdfb1ad6a6a36ae8be50e91af9d03d5f21c472bd05d04d3508172e0b519e76714333c7c74b
> 

Yes, for me the sha512sum is the same.

Regards,
Florian