From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#34498: Confusing msgid " Running value is ~s.~%" Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:41:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20190418154155.cboionc4lwy6rzpx@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190216061055.ia57pbmozniz5akd@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87sgufsiuc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hH9Ar-0005Ok-Aj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:42:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hH9Aq-0007tb-DU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:42:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hH9Aq-0007st-A2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:42:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hH9Ao-0002bN-Aw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:42:04 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sgufsiuc.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 34498@debbugs.gnu.org On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:34:03PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > > > I am fairly sure > > > > #: modules/shepherd/scripts/herd.scm:86 > > #, scheme-format > > msgid " Running value is ~s.~%" > > > > refers to the value of the #:running slot but translators don’t know > > that and would translate it as a value that is running. This should > > be changed and a comment for TRANSLATORS should be added. > > Done in Shepherd commit 5d418ff0de1ac0a5419344dfe70c08ed464f3797. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. No, it is not done. What the manual described as the @code{running} value, i.e. the value of the #:running slot, was understood by at least one translator not as the value of #:running but as a value which runs. > #. TRANSLATORS: The "~s" bit is most of the time a placeholder > #. for the PID (an integer) of the running process, and > #. occasionally for another Scheme object. This is not the information that translators need. Regards, Florian