From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5yf1-00059w-NW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:15:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5yf1-00006T-0s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:15:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5yf0-000063-LY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h5yf0-0004lp-Gz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:15:02 -0400 Subject: bug#34752: Duplicated work (sorry!) Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:14:19 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20190318201419.GB5501@jasmine.lan> References: <87imwi2zs6.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87imwi2zs6.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Katherine Cox-Buday Cc: 34752-done@debbugs.gnu.org --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 05:57:29PM -0500, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > Hey Leo, I've just submitted patch 34887. I didn't realize your patch > existed until I had already submitted. I apologize, I don't contribute > to projects managed in this style enough to have the workflow > internalized :( It's okay. Our work overlapped but we can consider it a very in-depth code review :) > At any rate, my patch does much the same thing except that it leaves > 1.11 in place as default. I did that for a couple of reasons: >=20 > - In organizations, it's very common for projects/teams to lag behind a > bit the newest releases, and for people installing Go through Guix, > it's nice to still have previous versions available. The Go team > officially supports LATEST-2 releases, and I think we should consider > doing the same. Okay, let's do this from now on. We can make Go 1.12 the default later. > - https://golang.org/doc/go1.12#gocache states that the build cache is > now required. I saw that you were experimenting with setting the home > directory to `/tmp`. The approach I considered taking was to modify > the Go build-system to override the `GOCACHE` environmental variable > when doing builds. Otherwise, any Go package will have to spoof the > home directory. Yeah... as discussed on IRC #guix yesterday, we have some work to do to fully support recent Go. --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlyP/BsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjeLxAAsADrzkovYUjgyJt/mReksJ91Vd557/k0QHzleAfPimCj6EGYIjQzIm2J w5FCWH0bqP8XmK1DJdvlwr/ezTeyYp6Q9tclFw6pgvKsn3w9cLS+R9t8NNtAOei7 M5IyWK5Lv3RR7+9rHH2GpYpo8GzZZ11Sm9V8aQVJ5NcahGpB32EtT0aWtPY0S9Gn Ba6uInf/sS+DNP/OxUxlQZsJu7+E2zCj/H6zraetGoU1AQJY1rC3v2zBvKClh6au eMXDsqskiLCmaGsAGDU4qI55CUebPinIiTEXgRmD9KZefLCNkwOxFViWdVpTj+2s /N2avuLKcOK4P9vl/K7Ue2QdX/1oza0qFs7E1KgSRmpp7HnIGsXb7X/poxYKsccr f8IePD9zffWpOFhnTOn+OeSXAueauNIwNR+G4tMRTHJQVv6+DWiRrukNWTcCODj0 W3AbMLj7AYkvVpV7e7mzy5lZYcihTRq9ndM1YWwdBCyUQT9aLjJYv7ptYvEk3cA3 XWnk3EWVPGsxVGXCMo45lHVpBlbFcSH1FT1wZJj5SQ7GV3A/jT7umi7YrpTH1wdN HJ3gMoE9ZFM0cphc8poqK6O+p+I163QGT4E0JzEC73FTSBwAGjbGpTUpPOcfslUh tc5kqocNJv7/XVo9SMvOUDAg3ZNGW/noQS2GzJWyzEe66UfUOeU= =MR1+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN--