From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Go build system updates and future work? Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:15:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20190314231511.GB25165@jasmine.lan> References: <20190314195224.GA18712@jasmine.lan> <87wol183z9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4ZoK-0002CI-QF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:30:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4ZZD-0007NC-AL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:15:15 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:37973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4ZZD-0007Mg-0S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:15:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wol183z9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:51:06PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Agreed! This should also make the Go importer more trivial to write/finish! Okay, I'll try it. The only part I'm not sure about is what to "build" or "test" for these library collections. Currently many of them run test suites, which is nice because it gives us some confidence the package is in good shape. We don't install any compiled libraries but it does help get the dependency graph in good shape. But the top level of the x/net repo, for example, does not have any Go files at all, so the package will effectively be source only with no testing. Maybe it won't be a problem in practice, I don't know. --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlyK4H8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiJlA//fqcLw6QNGrHqzUqhrrfhUk0+jm5qDUI7W9b5KTKgw7+cnMhfxIQ7bjuC dd6vM7+3jYarzB+awGPXaqJveoVOkjKNfAEFxSi5l/CbFkcroUCszpfHBhBzYTgn tg07ZCb/cYfmTYdyTdDLBouH59cKZ8NbmzO7gn807/Upc6C/3NgPyk2ZFUO9TKhE hX1QC1XrCp2Uwzt+XkXNzzIyo/taWtDVdblhc/52MmnID+3mapFdA4NCzU5spu5u ynCoaskB7s8gwV28uUvcOngfvmORHcnSEc35jkVL3QRy7HnfUCIjEgnBnc+v68IE 3RLqV/tXzyAdwDCm9r+twLUgXJ7Od95FrnEzMuTa8XTi3ezBrQ/ZX190uhAccYZw VkCf9vDAHFu28ioUS8+oi1z2cRWzyJ+wJQDfNwB7z7vR7FcDTVHVNk4/G0jY8gLS XSsOfLdvEqFA31g1WPSfsenntCsyNrDRd0zGiOR8bJJDLF/yaOA6D5xf+Z9LLNHT PQ8cP+t12vTCVqeWrQPeUd6EjUhdEWBw0XpyTVQxjO3+ItcPQzLUlXVGmYu20s0v lLNZaJ72WINeZs/ipt1NvNnql1DSnLvUh2jwBYkgt9PfsMLkOTVSKKpcBmahZ5mu RNUoiRSQEJ4L+ldLY+wRGk+JRp7pw5lYO3SQ/mG8Nl5+VCWB3ok= =gtgf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--