From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3QkN-0003cG-OL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:38:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3QkM-0003O2-Vt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:38:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3QkM-0003Ju-Jy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3QkM-0000qt-3s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:38:02 -0400 Subject: bug#33888: [PATCH] gnu: Add sway. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:37:34 +0100 From: Rutger Helling Message-ID: <20190311203734.0883cfc2@mykolab.com> In-Reply-To: <20181229140107.4d93b852@mykolab.com> References: <20181227160503.2d059a36@mykolab.com> <20181229140107.4d93b852@mykolab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/Ov_mWsSD7DWsvWQ0kxnROeQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 33888-done@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/Ov_mWsSD7DWsvWQ0kxnROeQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sway 1.0 just got released. Since this bug has been open for a very long time and all the pieces are in place, I've gone ahead with rebasing and merging. On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:01:07 +0100 Rutger Helling wrote: > I've been told that the Sway developers don't want this release > packaged. And it unfortunately also depends on staging, which I > missed. >=20 > Having said that, if there are no objections I'd like to merge this > once it hits 1.0 and staging is merged. >=20 > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:05:03 +0100 > Rutger Helling wrote: >=20 > > Hey Guix, > >=20 > > these patches add Sway. > >=20 > > Note that with > > (screen-locker-service sway "swaylock") > > we should now have a native Wayland screen locker. > >=20 > > Supposedly this can be done without making the swaylock binary SUID, > > but I've been unable to figure out how. =20 >=20 --Sig_/Ov_mWsSD7DWsvWQ0kxnROeQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEAVThuRzJ2e93ZI3n86cn20T8yjYFAlyGuP4ACgkQ86cn20T8 yjaafQf/bKBleSoFnTdIa0YefLwU+r/07G5xdRgUYc86+Gkus8249BQvhJUwd3XL V65J8KjiJIDdNu822KAcaNw9qHf2ftG9e3ZtHdZEdFdwYJWCKMxQhzuaLnuD67z8 18sLMsaW3t0peZ7aPJ8rvUpxSc02obQlKG4f9tN8UKi3Mv4026YOOUhGXD1ntPJM 52d0IsRSUhRenGisZp/+mAah8ylRv+qOK1Mi86ptSFPEQI/kMIfaPoe1Es64gRIY f0/s4zSiIWQoesLkBxRPfRJS2Hbe8kcnek0Wn9IpTbRZAEWp+O1MV4ceZk9eQBFa 2sfYuMq1WoKVWqsIdZ9qA+lzIH9fBA== =qOe2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Ov_mWsSD7DWsvWQ0kxnROeQ--