From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#34597: `guix challenge` - 41 packages differ Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:04:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20190221000414.GC28504@jasmine.lan> References: <20190220233151.GA23130@z.z> <87mumqhvcz.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3siQDZowHQqNOShm" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51531) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwbrN-0003T7-N4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:05:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwbrL-0004jj-Oh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:05:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwbrK-0004gh-9M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:05:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwbrJ-0004fl-LN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:05:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mumqhvcz.fsf@posteo.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Brett Gilio Cc: 34597@debbugs.gnu.org --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 05:51:24PM -0600, Brett Gilio wrote: > Unless I am mistaken this isn't truly a reportable bug. As you can see > in the guix challenge documentation > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-challenge.html > the purpose of challenge is to check for deterministic qualities in > reproducible packages. Right now, not all packages are reproducible as > the guix team is hard at work trying to find the best solution for > replacing binary seeds with something fully bootstrappable (see: > https://bootstrappable.org) There are a few types of reproducibility that we'd like to implement in Guix. There is the bootstrapping issue, as you mentioned. But we can still seek to build packages reproducibly even while Guix is built on the binary seeds. In most cases that bootstrapping strategy does not affect the reproducibility of packages. --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxt6v4ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjyKA/+LfqhP/uv4LMdvofoAyLhXY5huxZ1R2nzL3SjEEOhKNP8Tscsa3U+Zdti iQsKghSnZ9xaUIGAPIBaiVNHukTqWOB2BgyzIxl7EUWQ3uG6fum2eqEkxLX7w3tn S58nsbzQlEKcMwzxHH+BGFcfFN+8336s9giu+HPZgHxXHKRd1DhOjAnEfQ0jMSqY 0LZKO0WJIf9KLe0nwpr2Lh9fL+/aUm2oa9I3tujWQ95Nu5EzZlo/8dYAG6JJbk/V afb5dcYYXhBNYDoRnePwBjti+bmD5bZVJbIzYMW1OWTOX9X8Kb9kBd9sYcATyEp1 P4lL/K1OTMH8xOcBYGSb2+yG/spovnlt+e3t5D8LtXssPRNQUZtykSIsFqunN4fD hiFNP4B7LliAHGNPhkmlPxqzHNTZRl+chhi9Ti4LrjbBmXdEUs0mQ8YjvE0vsHCE 5uVz3lxm1tq266NAscwA65A6IdDrMX3sN65jwG2x9kT5HwwtNfNvYs+ESUo24Nqv HqGMKw+Zs/3zn8fVXkBR5GMgbz0V0jHTk/YwGLJEsnX/49HKGKoY2psO7NLkeEWc 29Rc2Gvnr4YsdZti5e+yRKN+l/7nfkWLVrrrp+rysmStua9n4pXoXngWGhWQIgy9 JE9KHbmIBfE23ZF2rVitGjCoN5tJt44mrr5WbRHFNisQzNWOGec= =Q9eG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3siQDZowHQqNOShm--