From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwEUd-0002Qw-Mh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:08:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwEUd-0002gj-53 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:08:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwEUd-0002gb-1V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:08:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwEUc-0003w0-Qd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:08:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#33026] Progress References: <20181012185854.9873-1-me@tobias.gr> In-Reply-To: <20181012185854.9873-1-me@tobias.gr> Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:07:44 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20190219230744.GA3513@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 33026@debbugs.gnu.org, 33020@debbugs.gnu.org Is this patch still of interest, or should we close the bug report? Andreas