From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: bug#34531: Guix profile fails on Overdrive 1000 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:27:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20190219082728.GA5650@jurong> References: <20190218200552.GB1881@jurong> <87mumsom9l.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49047) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw0l9-0006pm-VY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 03:28:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw0l7-0008VV-M3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 03:28:11 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw0l0-0008U1-BS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 03:28:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw0l0-0000M9-5R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 03:28:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mumsom9l.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 34531@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Marius, thanks a lot for your quick and helpful reply! On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:49:10PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > The Python contained within this Guix snapshot has a known bug that > makes it leak memory on newer kernels. The Guix commit that works > around it is 589aca1c183ef1dfdef54d40fdd6a258bbcd39d0. okay, so the main problem is fixed then. > One thing you could try is bootstrap a Guix checkout through the usual > mechanisms (./bootstrap; ./configure; etc), using packages from the host > system if necessary. The host system is Guix, so this is complicated... But I realise that there is also a guix-0.16.0 lying around, and with this I get beyond the python point. Before closing the bug, I would still like to ask whether there is a way of getting around the need for python. And why "guix pull -n" builds such a large number of packages, while one would expect it to just print a number of packages to be built. But maybe this is also solved in a later version already. Andreas