From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvw0p-0007re-Ud for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:24:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvw0p-0001ji-AD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:24:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvw0o-0001jU-Cp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:24:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gvw0o-0005vI-72 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:24:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#34515] [PATCH 06/13] gnu: Add python-treq. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:23:15 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20190219032315.GB2718@jasmine.lan> References: <4579ae8b04a0c15d83ea3696ef58d2ce2377381b.1550437064.git.leo@famulari.name> <8736oly0w0.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8GpibOaaTibBMecb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8736oly0w0.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 34515@debbugs.gnu.org --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:08:31AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >=20 > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > * gnu/packages/python-web.scm (python-treq): New variable. > [=E2=80=A6] > > + (description "This package provides an HTTP library inspired by > > +@code{requests}} but written on top of @code{Twisted's} Agents. >=20 > Should @code{=E2=80=A6} be moved from =E2=80=9CTwisted=E2=80=99s=E2=80=9D= to =E2=80=9CAgents=E2=80=9D? >=20 > Otherwise looks good to me. Thanks, will do. --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxrdqMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiPqQ//dtN75YdWzmL9/k5DustcYd2/bwDuYh8X4CjdFTZqRb5Dal9xKzeDI/Fa iJ2AVg7Axb2d4pgOk09bh6OHQZfDZg02wKWA6WV62nQKfxXeyWVL2care0kDeeRA agJcMzPtX7cgsYOvShbc93gva05U33y0ZvFqIk8fLGrDM729g3t52WBqgNXxhCjq K8p/H9jv5WQZZ40kxqEglUXIyFxWC1Qdmrb+JY4LhzLuKoUK2T5Mce6+fLdxzOPm I0L8uvWLt9EWXLdpYjR0ncUdwMWnFUqTTKmJ+n0SK8fyx4Ka99nBZIzQrfKEf1yG k3ala2R90nHtm7uaQhGiSyWbYYBuBRSshcu4HLEGuF5mQvuLwW7LDviwQe8bhoKU Nuk5G3kjLjeLGj5oSk0cy6BqaXvF9mzn2f/SZujHNTXn3WxbiQUP66vY07AfYaeo bKDouRntJcKGx2DYBkvUFslfKywnvfr6rh7jnnCtaJwbUT1jgnySXU5t1WsKiUSy P/8JCPmal9yrgTXcM76fu4BUHYOSkvxPZtjYJi2kvf56edjOnS+S+ShWKB86P6xP uQHfl0KmwF2ZdC4zFsLzqo/M+1sXk5xiGW6O9ZQmJqdemzogzBY+Hk4bYW5Mmcla WRMbaasGrj1eEDK0XksVe5e4YIhT7lt0JMEJqoW0kD4368QvLgU= =QJtU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8GpibOaaTibBMecb--