From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@no-log.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:47:23 +0100
Message-ID: <20190218144723.3f7e1549@primarylaptop>
References: <20190202192023.22087-1-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<87k1igpwk8.fsf@dismail.de> <20190203235204.63970587@parabola>
	<87sgx3mbcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvhf5f8d.fsf@dustycloud.org>
	<20190216030021.374f4c82@parabola>
	<CAE4v=pimnjQk-7GRK-cvenc_+a9frRu3_6_APgHoBJ_0CPjE0w@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions
	<gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	boundary="Sig_/vLE59AWEgfnfpVsnycHXaJR";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <gnu-linux-libre-bounces+gldg-gnu-linux-libre=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=pimnjQk-7GRK-cvenc_+a9frRu3_6_APgHoBJ_0CPjE0w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/gnu-linux-libre>,
	<mailto:gnu-linux-libre-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/>
List-Post: <mailto:gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gnu-linux-libre-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-linux-libre>,
	<mailto:gnu-linux-libre-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gnu-linux-libre-bounces+gldg-gnu-linux-libre=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: "gnu-linux-libre"
	<gnu-linux-libre-bounces+gldg-gnu-linux-libre=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions <gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org>
List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org

--Sig_/vLE59AWEgfnfpVsnycHXaJR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 12:16:41 +0100
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems to me, that there is a whole bunch of people interested in
> this, but due to lack of resources or for some other reasons nothing
> is really happening. Do you know any we we could help getting this
> resolved?
This is a very good point.

I also wonder if at the end, working to fix the problem by reviewing
chromium source code more carefully would take less resources than
discussing endlessly on how to deal with the fact that the source code
hasn't been reviewed.

Denis.

--Sig_/vLE59AWEgfnfpVsnycHXaJR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Kp9/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/vLE59AWEgfnfpVsnycHXaJR--