From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bill-auger Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium. Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:20:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20190216212006.598fcf79@parabola> References: <20190202192023.22087-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87k1igpwk8.fsf@dismail.de> <20190203235204.63970587@parabola> <87sgx3mbcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvhf5f8d.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20190216030021.374f4c82@parabola> <878syfwx59.fsf@fastmail.com> <8736onyabo.fsf@aminb.org> <875ztjwv5a.fsf@fastmail.com> Reply-To: Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <875ztjwv5a.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gnu-linux-libre-bounces+gldg-gnu-linux-libre=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "gnu-linux-libre" To: gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:33:21 +0100 Marius wrote: > Do we have > any reason to distrust what's written in the LICENSE file? based on your own account, you very explicitly distrust the code released by those authors in terms of privacy - so why would you implicitly trust it in terms of licensing - there seems to be a disjunct in logic there