From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59655) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqeaa-0002vw-HB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:47:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqeaY-0001et-Sy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:47:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqeaX-0001aY-7h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:47:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqeaW-0001cO-Mc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:47:04 -0500 Subject: [bug#28004] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:46:38 +0100 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20190204134638.GA8269@jasmine.lan> References: <20190202192023.22087-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87k1igpwk8.fsf@dismail.de> <20190203235204.63970587@parabola> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190203235204.63970587@parabola> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: bill-auger Cc: 28004@debbugs.gnu.org --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 11:52:04PM -0500, bill-auger wrote: > what is the evidence for this claim that this guix package is "free > software only"? - what does "Marks beautiful computed-origin-method" do > toward that end? - if a procedure for liberating any chromium-derived > software has been discovered, this would be a marvelous accomplishment > and very good news indeed, of which people outside of the guix dev team > would also be interested to learn If you have a concrete example of a Chromium component that is not free software please list it in a reply-all this email. In general, if upstream developers say their software is released under a free software license by putting the license header in the repo or in the files, then we take them at their word. --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxYQjcACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi+KhAAhu6rRIJtnL3jhGFuB+S7yQcwb2vYinLXn/BWurEvX3rfiY3tw7zfCjq4 d85halwnQOAI/m1X0v9PhGN0ZMsFkGoCsOpZiOzi/KR5L26ScQoUsLQl2Yn+sd06 LlryQU+hRPNYLJV9zPhdROrcQJTy1RwfONGbPluupwRxZxLW8+3fuj3xu5ZcH2cp O9MlPu3D+UwGTe3ysnJ8F3uvdEL6068jPTqRRYSi6/gQ0AXKZB+5QDLHiSAoiwu3 3OHnFBHxm+qm53fbXqh2fSbQE1CUPJD1vVCvZVhbydsVL92VxnSWY0sFjO6cQxvD Xp0AoFO6DxnyfNvqYI69iyiSaXdMU1E/3d6VStXu0jzZ2QRjboFL4p8oOrIAnLjl dorf9RRREgGv2kb3GNIJaNmp18MlydR7WMrqro9SvFHUPEc7WRDPnALdv6DOgyod 4+ZF3+AFM094n546g5SD+Ifzn/7RMgFWpUJTTlguOrnsVnVRsaUtGoqP8uwfrVm+ AzN+Z7N2uZLU4TJNfoQi1ybF9qtD7BuNhdpC7yupsvQ0tkPHSA0UJiOl15VZ1Von vSWlp7UE3WtMW2xeSVgPIZUrMdSc202pTmpYGVQmtEN9shgEBLFhQq2cpPjyomH3 c8Zl0M1FfEKbeAg8RS9ie1TTkRl8hQHRYHcpDUB1jfWYCu5VD9A= =N6fH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--