From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60479) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqOvr-0008Uu-MI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:04:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqOvq-0006TO-RV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:04:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqOvq-0006T3-Ly for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:04:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqOvq-0004fe-GK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 16:04:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#34217] [PATCH 01/11] gnu: Add ruby-cucumber-wire. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:03:39 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20190203220328.747b1454@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <20190127114956.26570-1-mail@cbaines.net> References: <87zhrmgy0x.fsf@cbaines.net> <20190127114956.26570-1-mail@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Baines Cc: 34217@debbugs.gnu.org On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:49:46 +0000 Christopher Baines wrote: > Package version 0.0.1 initially, as this is what's needed by Cucumber > 3, and Cucumber 4 hasn't been released yet. I would prefer to see this hint as a comment in the code, not in the commit message: When I as a developer stumble upon the package definition and see it is outdated, I would just update it and not search all commit messages to find out it shouldn't. A comment near the package definition or version would prevent that mistake. Otherwise, LGTM. Thanks, Bj=C3=B6rn