From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: bug#32835: icecat show many warning and don't display correctly Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:54:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20190127155410.GC10186__30882.4802444846$1548604523$gmane$org@jurong> References: <20190107181000.GA14844@jurong> <78584a9f1b7beabb5b6b09d6a67aa84e@riseup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnmlz-00039p-DI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:55:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnmly-0001Gf-Mr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:55:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnmly-0001GQ-Ja for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:55:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gnmly-0008J2-HR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:55:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <78584a9f1b7beabb5b6b09d6a67aa84e@riseup.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: quiliro@fsfla.org Cc: 32835@debbugs.gnu.org, help-guix@gnu.org Hello, On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 07:57:40AM -0800, Quiliro Ordonez wrote: > El 2019-01-07 21:41, 荒井吉則 escribió: > > It's working. > > > > export > > XDG_DATA_DIRS="$HOME/.guix-profile/share${XDG_DATA_DIRS:+:}$XDG_DATA_DIRS" > > icecat & > does not work. > > export > XDG_DATA_DIRS="$HOME/.guix-profile/share${XDG_DATA_DIRS:+:}$XDG_DATA_DIRS" > && icecat & > works perfectly. > > Must something be modified on the software definition? This is not > something the user should change. this seems to be the same problem as bug #32835, which I am cc-ing. Do we need to add search paths? Or wrap a binary? Andreas