From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Merging staging? Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:27:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20190109162729.GA18849@macbook41> References: <20181223140048.GE2581@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghGhZ-0007sZ-SP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 11:27:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghGhY-0006kA-S0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 11:27:33 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:39612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghGhY-0006jB-LR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 11:27:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181223140048.GE2581@macbook41> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote: > > Hi Guix, > >=20 > > I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some time. = Here > > are some stats about the current state of substitutes for staging: > >=20 > > According to guix weather, we have: > >=20 > > | architecture | berlin | hydra | > > +--------------+--------+-------+ > > | x86_64 | 36.5% | 81.7% | > > | i686 | 23.8% | 71.0% | > > | aarch64 | 22.2% | 00.0% | > > | armhf | 17.0% | 45.6% | > >=20 > > What should the next step be? > >=20 >=20 I merged master into staging today and got the following chart: | architecture | berlin | hydra | +--------------+--------+-------+ | x86_64 | 42.2% | 78.8% | | i686 | 28.2% | 64.3% | | aarch64 | 0% | 23.0% | | armhf | 16.8% | 50.4% | but compared to master: | architecture | berlin | hydra | +--------------+--------+-------+ | x86_64 | 57.5% | 91.9% | | i686 | 44.4% | 77.8% | | aarch64 | 0% | 41.8% | | armhf | 30.3% | 69.6% | So I think I'd like to see a comparison on hydra of staging vs master and if it's good enough we go ahead and merge --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlw2IO0ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HFkQ//VKsDZ7GikJnbC4qU7u7j7affiV7HYlQ3NNpcjnrdMeSu4oOtMiRs1aI1 jUyBDxQMw3rvREk9+5PO5Ow8icTrI5kdjdMSy1DLA9anntYpAwVQogf7pVYkTXXm KQSjVUJyl4bEODclmS3+1rA1lbJTCjgHnqE1o4dS/Df9j6OcdcQxX9fVDUeiFqoX 9cti4Vcmx1UCxze0ilEVVgda/PhQZrZ2iB9lSOOQmkTTjeTKSu7rVDNLw7iIedDo kSbf1h/1zmwkkmC2ykIIc/Ewk2tEIzLF/YEkIZx3akTXjhdRC1gm3KLOgEjDLlpB XO1Cf3IMJrNN65e+A4TMPgVmNjwS+hQ1+UT9GJgN0zKI6BnJbY2BWYIrgPtlpOew rDTjYS625JpdLMX0jI5tU/bgit+0uZ4LUBSYbn+cnsIvSRIjwGzWUr7wgYXxkljI 3oqD8fP+tBpTUzTRRrECDsabSnsd/TIUUmNrqvJs7vSF2UaHGluwNa//u6sKNi7C CUJn1kSoQp3kyqWxEfeUmATqRkyUuFNj5b1OCltrxdnWtwAXUpaN6wfXMMZtekSa yLM8yQ+z2E8XJ2050FGPnymrJe66AWbuI1Hf6TY7gs6Fw1VrbIwbvMcbSSEqH/3J OpeUGldEoYlhuDh3MZbJVPIsAGQ/stxvRNMKZ9nLrk8vqtPGWPc= =cgIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--