From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
Subject: Re: Better names for Guix versions from git?
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:53:04 +0100
Message-ID: <20181229125304.5a193360@alma-ubu>
References: <87lg4dwfmt.fsf@gmail.com>
	<351d14fe-0edd-6575-939d-981598b65255@riseup.net>
	<87k1jw8jyp.fsf@fastmail.com>
	<CAJuFOK4=5kHmL+4NZqW--t5-RpN9Ddzx0w97PmgY3xpo-YfU9A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	boundary="Sig_/KD5WdOWs7dQN9tKdO44JZ4E";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33877)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>)
	id 1gdDBg-0005db-Dz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 06:54:47 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>)
	id 1gdDAx-00012H-8Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 06:53:52 -0500
Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:51540 helo=bjoernhoefling.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>)
	id 1gdDAx-00011q-0O
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 06:53:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJuFOK4=5kHmL+4NZqW--t5-RpN9Ddzx0w97PmgY3xpo-YfU9A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--Sig_/KD5WdOWs7dQN9tKdO44JZ4E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:30:11 +0100
Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer@gmail.com> wrote:

> I like dates in "rolling release" version strings because they
> immediately tell you how old/new the version is, but I can certainly
> live with that format too. Definitely better than what we have.

I also would prefer a string containing the date.

Bj=C3=B6rn

--Sig_/KD5WdOWs7dQN9tKdO44JZ4E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlwnYCAACgkQvyhstlk+X/3HMgCfU+VHsaMt3H7xHbACFADdqhxH
oZUAnRV4H0bV4C1/Hue0LZF9aompXbFe
=KYKE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/KD5WdOWs7dQN9tKdO44JZ4E--