From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net>
Subject: Re: 02/02: import: Update opam importer.
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:19:45 -0600
Message-ID: <20181219171945.2b7429ac@centurylink.net>
References: <20181218212618.4f655d4e@centurylink.net> <875zvpwoj9.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	boundary="Sig_/U/6kjKwKfR0IXJS6gFfwFx7";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-commits-bounces+gcggs-guix-commits=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <875zvpwoj9.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-commits>,
	<mailto:guix-commits-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-commits/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-commits@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-commits-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-commits>,
	<mailto:guix-commits-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-commits-bounces+gcggs-guix-commits=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-commits"
	<guix-commits-bounces+gcggs-guix-commits=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, julien@lepiller.eu, guix-commits@gnu.org
List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org

--Sig_/U/6kjKwKfR0IXJS6gFfwFx7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:59:22 +0100
Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>=20
> Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net> skribis:
>=20
> >> commit cce654fabdf09cac7d18f9bad842ba8445aa022c
> >> Author: Julien Lepiller <address@hidden>
> >> Date:   Mon Dec 17 21:05:35 2018 +0100
> >>=20
> >>     import: Update opam importer.
> >>    =20
> >>     * guix/import/opam.scm: Update importer for opam 2.
> >>     * tests/opam.scm: Update tests for the opam 2 importer. =20
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> > This commit breaks Guix compatibility with Guile 2.0:
> >
> >   $ guix build -K --with-commit=3Dguile2.0-guix=3Dcce654fabf guile2.0-g=
uix =20
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> >    ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("no code for module" (ice-9 p=
eg)) #f] =20
>=20
> As discussed earlier, I=E2=80=99ll propose soon (like real soon!) a patch=
 to
> remove support for 2.0.  In that spirit, I think we can leave it as is.

That's fine with me.

> Besides, I=E2=80=99m glad you thought about using =E2=80=98--with-commit=
=E2=80=99 for this use
> case.  :-)

It's very useful indeed!

`~Eric

--Sig_/U/6kjKwKfR0IXJS6gFfwFx7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=X5wU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/U/6kjKwKfR0IXJS6gFfwFx7--