From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#33712: Some Mercurial checkouts probably have incorrect hashes [was Re: hg-fetch with subrepos] Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:08:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20181212020819.GF6546@jasmine.lan> References: <72DC8AB8-2987-4EEB-BB69-4FCEF0B1D496@asu.edu> <20181202115355.51c943b5@alma-ubu> <87mupoowrn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XStn23h1fwudRqtG" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57353) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWtxT-0002o2-3d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:09:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWtxP-0007Cf-5A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:09:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWtxP-0007CY-0W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:09:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWtxO-0000yJ-Nb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:09:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWtwu-0002l4-KK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:08:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWtwq-00066G-Lo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:08:32 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:35035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWtwo-00062D-MK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:08:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [172.58.201.235]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 76FCAE446A for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:08:20 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mupoowrn.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 33712@debbugs.gnu.org --XStn23h1fwudRqtG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 02:58:52PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling skribis: > > And I stumbled upon that problem too. Ludovic explained me on IRC: The > > problem is the metadata directory ".hg": It contains metadata that is > > not fixed. For normal hg-repositories, it will be stripped away, but > > not recursively for those with sub-repos. [...] > However, we should audit current uses of =E2=80=98hg-fetch=E2=80=99 with = recursive > sub-repos because there hashes are most likely wrong already. --XStn23h1fwudRqtG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlwQbZMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgHIQ//fB9u7x2MuxcUaeqrREymGwJkSecNbOsrzoXke3lkhavBYLhcsmRyNJWD 3gHnDilGrLj6DYXE653IGcuX19bx3EZCtvdIgJMeOC2Oc6bg73L1qpZnqYeEjR/E eWEe9WBwEjleY4UJhIMRnIb5wquOYS77nr4C5RbjtxeW3l5GvMXVVceghQmihcM3 mteResmiGAJUSxnA6lscqGVKoHRLfipqElvNjY3qC4uZn0cH2KDWN1dQl1sHAThu Bxvq7VSbpqxfMM5QdFXvO5y0bwXVwZ3O+/phHzjw5j9T/Uy3QV7JNGCBVNdw4yiD KwiP6qHpOrCihRtAZGbFyzI+vUYmoMzLvXGD44ts1JDD2aief806+ZnP6pOd639W kQoAsNa/okGpXkdz6J3yvXyqfgYtyxMKl6nnsZX2DJ/OTl8cIT39+geCNgPHGcU0 ZcQo49xYLihvUIWuFcrq6B/kdRpoBo59i6BAVTcZrag4emuaDoBsqiBBIqLRJ6GF F1hSO3oU/xES1W1oJq4KG0W7JGQ/H71Vx+/WFQgJkZDOlNMlem3OHiLoqu2ZsVpG adUxHvMag+bkK3Z4kZV+Ei3Glo/4g9jvg9qXgRinItMEhlH5RU0uxn+EXuUyfptI /qQmpLd6hIb4uJyY9KqezaWEdopzkFo/9UjXbQzrwKKp+1Oam44= =7cmR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XStn23h1fwudRqtG--